I’m sharing this because I think the comparison will help sharpen some of the UI/UX & data-model decisions for StellaOps — especially around how “evidence + suppression + audit/export” flows are implemented in existing tools and which patterns we might want to emulate or avoid. Here’s a compact snapshot (with recent documentation/screens and dates) of how a few major players — Snyk, GitHub (via repo scanning), Aqua Security / container scanning, Anchore/Grype, and Prisma Cloud — handle evidence, ignores (suppression / VEX), and audit/export primitives. --- ## ✅ What works: Evidence & audit flows that provide clarity **Snyk — good “evidence + data flow + context” for code vulnerabilities** * In Snyk Code, each issue links to a full “Data flow” trace from source to sink. ([Snyk User Docs][1]) * The UI hyperlinks to the Git repo, providing code-level context and version control traceability. ([Snyk User Docs][1]) * “Fix analysis” surfaces recommended fixes, diff examples, and community-driven suggestions. ([Snyk User Docs][1]) This deep evidence linkage is a valuable pattern for StellaOps triage and remediation. **Anchore/Grype — VEX-aware suppression + SBOM export readiness** * Anchore Enterprise documents vulnerability annotations + VEX support (SBOM scanning, annotations, fix statuses). ([Anchore Documentation][2]) * Grype respects VEX statuses (`not_affected`, `fixed`) and can expose suppressed matches via `--show-suppressed`. ([GitHub][3]) * Justifications can be scoped (e.g., `vulnerable_code_not_present` filters) and the API surfaces (Oct 2025) enable automation of SBOM + VEX + diffed results. ([Anchore Documentation][2]) This forms a solid SBOM → vulnerability → VEX → audit/export pipeline. --- ## ⚠️ Where things are brittle **Snyk — suppression semantics vary across scan types** * Ignore rules are project/integration-specific; UI ignores may not carry over to CLI import flows. ([Snyk][4]) * Snyk Code uses separate suppression UX (IDE/CLI) from OSS scans, leading to fragmentation. ([Snyk User Docs][5]) **Anchore/Grype — operational caveats** * Feb 2025 issue: VEX suppression failed for directory scans because the source type wasn’t supported. ([GitHub][6]) * Some suppressions require explicit config (`GRYPE_VEX_ADD`). ([GitHub][3]) * Ensuring SBOM + VEX + diffed outputs for audits often needs extra orchestration. **Prisma Cloud — audit/export primitives are coarse** * “Suppress Code Issues” feature exists, but no public doc shows an end-to-end SBOM + VEX + audit export flow. ([Prisma Cloud Documentation][7]) * Repo scanning + suppression features exist, but forensic traceability appears limited to “report + suppress”. ([Prisma Cloud Documentation][8]) --- ## 🔑 What StellaOps should copy / avoid **Copy** * Snyk Code evidence + fix linking provides actionable traceability. * Anchore/Grype SBOM → VEX suppression → facade for automation is the workflow to engineer. * Surface suppression metadata (reason, status, justification) for auditing suppressed items. **Avoid** * Fragmented ignore rules per scan surface (OSS vs Code vs Container). Instead, keep suppression consistent. * Hidden suppression; tie it to the main UI instead of a “show suppressed” toggle. * Incomplete VEX support for certain source types; test across containers, directories, binaries, SBOMs. If helpful, I can build a spreadsheet (Snyk, GitHub, Aqua, Anchore/Grype, Prisma Cloud) comparing evidence, suppression, APIs, exports, and gaps with doc links. [1]: https://docs.snyk.io/scan-with-snyk/snyk-code/manage-code-vulnerabilities/breakdown-of-code-analysis?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Breakdown of Code analysis" [2]: https://docs.anchore.com/current/docs/vulnerability_management/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Anchore Secure - Vulnerability Management" [3]: https://github.com/anchore/grype?utm_source=chatgpt.com "anchore/grype: A vulnerability scanner for container ..." [4]: https://snyk.io/blog/ignoring-vulnerabilities-with-snyk/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Ignoring vulnerabilities with Snyk" [5]: https://docs.snyk.io/manage-risk/prioritize-issues-for-fixing/ignore-issues/exclude-files-and-ignore-issues-faqs?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Exclude files and ignore issues FAQs" [6]: https://github.com/anchore/grype/issues/2471?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Support using VEX documents with directory scans and ..." [7]: https://docs.prismacloud.io/en/enterprise-edition/content-collections/application-security/risk-management/monitor-and-manage-code-build/suppress-code-issues?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Suppress Code Issues - Prisma Cloud Documentation" [8]: https://docs.prismacloud.io/en/compute-edition/32/admin-guide/vulnerability-management/code-repo-scanning?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Configure code repository scanning" Matrix built. I’ll keep it compact enough to scan quickly, but detailed enough that you can lift it straight into a Google Sheet / Confluence page. --- ## 1. Evidence & context: what a *single finding* looks like | Dimension | Snyk | GitHub Advanced Security | Aqua / Trivy | Anchore / Grype (Anchore Enterprise) | Prisma Cloud | | ----------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | **Code-level evidence** | Snyk Code shows a *Data flow* view (taint graph) from source → sink with step-by-step code lines in the UI and IDE. ([docs.snyk.io][1]) | Code scanning alerts show file/line and, for data-flow rules, a “how data moves through the code” view with **Show paths** for the full flow. ([GitHub Docs][2]) | Trivy is not a SAST engine; evidence is per-file / resource for vulnerabilities & misconfigurations (IaC, K8s, etc.), not data-flow graphs. ([Trivy][3]) | No SAST; evidence is package / image / SBOM level (CVE, package, version, location). Grype is focused on images/filesystems, not code flows. ([Chainguard Academy][4]) | AppSec module shows issues mapped to file & line and offers inline remediation/fix flows; surfaced in console and IDE plugins (JetBrains/VS Code). ([Palo Alto Networks][5]) | | **Dependency / container evidence** | For OSS & containers, Snyk shows dependency paths and has a **project issue paths** API that returns the introduction chain for a vuln. ([docs.snyk.io][6]) | Dependabot alerts show vulnerable package, version, advisories, and affected functions to help decide if code actually uses them. ([GitHub Docs][7]) | Trivy shows image → layer → package → vuln with installed/fixed versions; same for repos & filesystems in JSON/SARIF. ([GitHub][8]) | Grype output lists artifact, package, version, location, severity; when paired with Syft SBOM, you get full component graph for images and other artifacts. ([Chainguard Academy][4]) | Prisma’s Vulnerability Explorer & scan reports show image/host, package, severity and compliance IDs for image and host scans. ([docs.prismacloud.io][9]) | | **SBOM / supply-chain context** | `snyk sbom` generates CycloneDX and SPDX SBOMs for local projects; Snyk also supports SBOM export in enterprise tiers. ([docs.snyk.io][10]) | GitHub builds a dependency graph from manifests and ingests SARIF from external scanners; it is SBOM-adjacent but not an SBOM UI. ([GitHub Docs][11]) | Trivy can output SBOMs (CycloneDX, SPDX, SPDX-JSON) and Kubernetes “KBOM” views, and is often used as the SBOM generator. ([Chainguard Academy][12]) | Anchore Enterprise is explicitly “SBOM-powered”; SBOM management views let you navigate applications and export SBOM-centric vulnerability views. ([docs.anchore.com][13]) | Prisma Cloud is inventory-/RQL-centric; SBOMs are not a first-class UI artifact and there is no public doc for full SBOM navigation comparable to Anchore or Trivy. ([Palo Alto Networks][5]) | | **Where the evidence appears** | Web UI, CLI, IDEs (VS Code, JetBrains) and PR checks. Ignores for Snyk Code are now “consistent” across UI/CLI/IDE (2025-11 EA). ([docs.snyk.io][14]) | Web UI (Security tab), PR Conversation tab for code scanning reviews, REST & GraphQL APIs, and SARIF imports from many scanners. ([GitHub Docs][15]) | Trivy: CLI / JSON / SARIF / CI integrations (GitHub Actions, etc.). Aqua Platform adds a CNAPP UI with risk-based vulnerability views. ([GitHub][8]) | Grype: CLI & JSON/SARIF outputs; Anchore Enterprise: browser UI (dashboards, SBOM views, reporting) plus REST/GraphQL APIs. ([Chainguard Academy][4]) | Prisma Cloud: web console (AppSec dashboards, Vulnerability Explorer), REST APIs, IDE plugins for JetBrains & VS Code. ([docs.prismacloud.io][16]) | --- ## 2. Suppression / ignore / VEX behavior | Dimension | Snyk | GitHub Advanced Security | Aqua / Trivy | Anchore / Grype (Anchore Enterprise) | Prisma Cloud | | ---------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | **Suppression primitives** | `.snyk` policy file for OSS & container & IaC; `snyk ignore` CLI; “Ignore” in web UI; Snyk Code uses UI/CLI/IDE ignores but *not* `.snyk`. ([docs.snyk.io][17]) | Code scanning and Dependabot alerts can be **dismissed** with reasons; Dependabot has auto-triage rules (auto-dismiss/snooze). ([GitHub Docs][18]) | Trivy: `.trivyignore` / `.trivyignore.yaml` lists vuln IDs; `--ignore-policy` for Rego-based filtering; severity filters. ([aquasecurity.github.io][19]) | Grype: VEX-aware filtering via `--vex` and ignore rules; Anchore Enterprise: UI-driven vulnerability annotations that act as a structured “suppress or re-classify” layer. ([GitHub][20]) | AppSec: “Suppress Code Issues” (per-issue or globally) and more general suppression rules (disable policy / by source / by resource / by tag). ([docs.prismacloud.io][21]) | | **Metadata captured with suppression** | `snyk ignore` supports `--reason` and `--expiry`; UI shows who ignored and allows editing/unignore; APIs expose `ignoreReasons` on issues. ([docs.snyk.io][17]) | Dismissal reason: `false positive`, `won't fix`, `used in tests`; optional comment. Dismissal requests for code scanning add requester/reviewer, timestamps, status. ([GitHub Docs][22]) | Ignores live in repo-local files (`.trivyignore*`) or Rego policies; VEX documents contribute status metadata (per CVE, per product). No central UI metadata by default. ([aquasecurity.github.io][19]) | Annotations carry VEX-aligned status plus explanatory text; RBAC role `vuln-annotator-editor` controls who can create/modify/delete them. ([docs.anchore.com][23]) | Suppressions include justification text; there is a dedicated API to retrieve suppression justifications by policy ID and query (auditable). ([pan.dev][24]) | | **Scope & consistency** | Ignores are *local* to project/integration/org; ignoring in a Git repo project does not automatically ignore the same issue imported via CLI. Snyk Code ignore semantics differ from OSS/Container (no `.snyk`). ([Snyk][25]) | Dismissals attach to a specific alert (repo, branch baseline); PRs inherit baseline. Dependabot has repo-level config (`dependabot.yml`) and org-level alert configuration. ([GitHub Docs][7]) | Suppression is run-local: `.trivyignore` travels with source, policies live in config repos; VEX docs are attached per artifact or discovered via VEX Hub / registries. Reproducible but not centralized unless you build it. ([aquasecurity.github.io][19]) | Grype suppression is per scan & VEX document; Anchore Enterprise stores annotations centrally per artifact and exposes them consistently in UI/API and exported VEX. ([GitHub][20]) | Suppression rules can be global, per source, per resource, or tag-scoped; they affect console views and API results consistently when filters are applied. ([pan.dev][24]) | | **VEX support (ingest + semantics)** | Snyk generates SBOMs but has no documented first-class VEX ingestion or export; VEX is referenced mostly at the SBOM/standards level, not as a product feature. ([Snyk][26]) | No native VEX semantics in alerts; GitHub consumes SARIF only. VEX can exist in repos or external systems but is not interpreted by GHAS. ([GitHub Docs][11]) | Trivy has **explicit VEX support**: supports OpenVEX, CycloneDX VEX, and CSAF VEX, using local files, VEX repositories, SBOM externalReferences, and OCI VEX attestations to filter results. ([Trivy][27]) | Grype has VEX-first behavior: `--vex` to ingest OpenVEX; by default `not_affected`/`fixed` go to an ignore set; `--show-suppressed` exposes them. Anchore Enterprise 5.22+ adds OpenVEX export and CycloneDX VEX export (5.23). ([GitHub][20]) | No public documentation of native VEX ingestion or export; prioritization is via policies/RQL rather than VEX semantics. | | **Default handling of suppressed items** | Ignored issues are hidden by default in UI/CLI/IDE views to reduce noise; some tools like `snyk-to-html` will still show ignored Snyk Code issues. ([docs.snyk.io][28]) | Dismissed / auto-dismissed alerts are *not* shown by default (`is:open` filter); you must explicitly filter for closed / auto-dismissed alerts. ([GitHub Docs][29]) | When VEX is supplied, non-affected/fixed statuses are filtered out; suppressed entries are generally not shown unless you adjust filters/output. Some edge-cases exist around `.trivyignore.yaml` behavior. ([Trivy][27]) | Grype hides suppressed matches unless `--show-suppressed` is set; community discussions explicitly argue for “suppressed hidden by default” across all formats. ([artifacthub.io][30]) | Suppressed / excluded issues are hidden from normal risk views and searches and only visible via explicit filters or suppression APIs. ([pan.dev][24]) | | **Known pain points** | Fragmented semantics: Snyk Code vs OSS/Container vs IaC handle ignores differently; ignores are not global across ingest types. ([docs.snyk.io][31]) | Dismissal is per-tool: Dependabot rules don’t govern CodeQL and vice-versa; no VEX; you must build cross-tool policy on top. | Some rough edges reported around `.trivyignore.yaml` and SARIF vs exit-code behavior; VEX support is powerful but still labeled experimental in docs. ([GitHub][32]) | VEX support for certain source types (e.g., some directory + SBOM combos) has had bugs; suppressed entries disappear by default unless you remember `--show-suppressed`. ([GitHub][33]) | No VEX, and suppression semantics may diverge across CSPM/AppSec/Compute; complexity of RQL and multiple modules can make suppression strategy opaque without good governance. ([Palo Alto Networks][5]) | --- ## 3. Audit & export primitives | Dimension | Snyk | GitHub Advanced Security | Aqua / Trivy | Anchore / Grype (Anchore Enterprise) | Prisma Cloud | | ------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | **Built-in UI exports** | Reporting UI lets you export reports as PDF and table data as CSV; you can also download CSV from several report views. ([docs.snyk.io][34]) | UI is mostly “view only”; some security overview exports are available, but reports are usually built via API or marketplace actions (e.g., PDF report GitHub Action). ([GitHub Docs][35]) | Aqua Platform provides CSV exports and API integrations for vulnerability reports; on-prem deployments can export “user policy data, vulnerability data and system settings data.” ([Aqua][36]) | SBOM/Vulnerability views have an **Export CSV** button; the Reports service aggregates via GraphQL into CSV/JSON from pre-built templates and dashboards. ([docs.anchore.com][37]) | Vulnerability Explorer and scan reports allow CSV export; code-build issues can be exported with filters as CSV from the AppSec UI. ([docs.prismacloud.io][16]) | | **Machine-readable exports / APIs** | REST Issues API; Export API (GA) to create CSV exports via async jobs; SBOM CLI (`snyk sbom`) for CycloneDX/SPDX; audit log export for user actions. ([docs.snyk.io][38]) | SARIF input/output; REST & GraphQL APIs for code scanning & Dependabot; many third-party actions to transform alerts into PDFs/CSVs or send to other systems. ([GitHub Docs][11]) | Trivy outputs JSON, SARIF, CycloneDX, SPDX, SPDX-JSON, GitHub formats; these can be uploaded into GHAS or other platforms. Aqua exposes vulnerability data via API. ([Trivy][39]) | Grype outputs JSON, table, CycloneDX, SARIF, plus Go-template based CSV; Anchore Enterprise exposes APIs for vulnerabilities, policies, and reports. ([Chainguard Academy][4]) | CSPM/AppSec APIs: `vulnerabilities/search` (JSON) and `.../search/download` (GZIP CSV) for RQL queries; broader Prisma Cloud API for automation/integration. ([pan.dev][40]) | | **VEX / “authoritative statement” export** | No native VEX export; at best you can export SBOMs and issues and post-process into VEX with external tooling. ([Snyk][26]) | None. Vendors can publish VEX separately, but GHAS doesn’t emit VEX. | Trivy consumes VEX but does not itself author VEX; Aqua operates VEX Hub as a central repository of vendor VEX documents rather than as a generator. ([Trivy][27]) | Anchore Enterprise 5.22/5.23 is currently the most “productized” VEX exporter: OpenVEX and CycloneDX VEX including annotations, PURLs, metadata about the scanned image. ([docs.anchore.com][41]) | No VEX export; risk posture is expressed via internal policies, not standardized exploitability statements. | | **Suppression / ignore audit** | Ignored issues can be exported by filtering for “Ignored” in Reporting and downloading CSV; APIs expose ignore reasons; audit log export records user actions such as ignoring issues. ([docs.snyk.io][42]) | Code scanning dismissal requests are full audit records (who requested, who approved, reason, timestamps). Dependabot dismissal comments & auto-dismissed alerts are queryable via GraphQL/REST and UI filters. ([GitHub Docs][43]) | Auditability is repo-driven: `.trivyignore`/VEX/rego live in version control; Aqua’s own reporting/APIs can include current vulnerability state but do not (publicly) expose a dedicated VEX change log. ([aquasecurity.github.io][19]) | Annotations are first-class objects, controlled via RBAC and exportable as OpenVEX/CycloneDX VEX; this effectively *is* an audit log of “why we suppressed or downgraded this CVE” over time. ([docs.anchore.com][23]) | Suppression justification APIs provide a structured record of why and where policies are suppressed; combined with CSV/API exports of vulns, this gives a workable audit trail for regulators. ([pan.dev][24]) | --- ## 4. What this suggests for StellaOps UX & data-model ### Patterns worth copying 1. **Data-flow & path-level “evidence” as the default detail view** * Snyk Code’s taint-flow UI and GitHub’s “Show paths” for CodeQL alerts make a single issue *explain itself* without leaving the tool. ([docs.snyk.io][1]) * For StellaOps: * For code: provide a path graph (source → sanitizers → sinks) with line-level jumps. * For SBOM/containers: mirror Snyk’s Project Issue Paths & Grype/Syft by showing a dependency path or image-layer path for each CVE. 2. **VEX-first suppression semantics** * Trivy and Grype treat VEX as the *canonical* suppression mechanism; statuses like `not_affected` / `fixed` hide findings by default, with CLI flags to show suppressed. ([Trivy][27]) * Anchore Enterprise adds a full annotation workflow and emits OpenVEX/CycloneDX VEX as the authoritative vendor statement. ([docs.anchore.com][23]) * For StellaOps: make VEX status the **single source of truth** for suppression across all modules, and always be able to reconstruct a proof tree: SBOM → vuln → VEX statement → policy decision. 3. **Rich suppression metadata with explicit justification & expiry** * Snyk captures reason + expiry; GitHub uses structured reasons + free-form comment; Prisma provides a dedicated suppression-justification API. ([docs.snyk.io][17]) * For StellaOps: require a reason taxonomy + free-text + optional “proof link” (e.g., internal ticket, upstream vendor VEX) for any “Not Affected” or “Won’t Fix,” and store that as part of the public proof spine. 4. **Strong export & API stories for regulators** * Snyk’s Export API, Anchore’s Reports service, and Prisma’s RQL+CSV APIs give customers reliable machine-readable exports for audits and custom BI. ([updates.snyk.io][44]) * Anchore’s CycloneDX VEX export is the best current model for “signable, portable, regulator-friendly” proofs. ([Security Boulevard][45]) * For StellaOps: * Treat CSV/JSON/SBOM/VEX exports as *first-class* features, not add-ons. * Tie them to deterministic scan manifests and graph revision IDs (your “trust algebra” backbone) so an auditor can replay any historical report. 5. **Repo-local suppression files as “policy as code”** * `.snyk`, `.trivyignore`, Rego policies, and VEX docs living alongside source are proven patterns for reproducible suppression. ([docs.snyk.io][46]) * For StellaOps: mirror this with a small set of declarative files (`stellaops.vexmap.yaml`, `trust-lattice.yaml`) that your engine and UI both honor. ### Patterns to deliberately avoid 1. **Fragmented ignore semantics by scan type** * Snyk’s different behavior across Code vs OSS vs Container vs IaC (e.g., `.snyk` not honored for Snyk Code) is a recurring source of confusion. ([docs.snyk.io][31]) * For StellaOps: a single suppression model (VEX+policy) must apply consistently whether the evidence came from SAST, SBOM, container scan, or runtime telemetry. 2. **Making suppressed issues effectively invisible** * Grype and GitHub both hide suppressed/dismissed issues by default and require extra flags/filters to see them. ([artifacthub.io][30]) * For StellaOps: * Default UI for any artifact should show a small, always-visible “suppressed” counter with a click-through view. * Every export format should have an option to include suppressed entries with their VEX status and reasoning. 3. **Lack of a standard “authoritative statement” artifact** * Snyk, GitHub, Prisma Cloud all rely on internal notions of suppression and policy without emitting a standardized VEX or equivalent artifact. ([Snyk][26]) * For StellaOps: your “Proof-of-Integrity Graph” and VEX exports should be the primary way vendors and customers communicate risk, not just internal UI states. 4. **Over-reliance on informal text for serious decisions** * Many tools lean heavily on free-form comments (GitHub dismissal comments, Snyk ignore reasons) without tying them to structured policies or verifiable upstream evidence. ([GitHub Docs][22]) * For StellaOps: keep free text, but anchor it in structured fields (VEX status, justification category, linked upstream VEX/SBOM, ticket ID) and make these queryable across the entire system. If you want, next step can be a **StellaOps UX spec** that maps each of these rows to concrete screens and micro-interactions (e.g., “Finding details drawer,” “Suppression dialog,” “Export / attest dialog”) so your .NET/Angular team has something they can implement directly. [1]: https://docs.snyk.io/scan-with-snyk/snyk-code/manage-code-vulnerabilities/breakdown-of-code-analysis?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Breakdown of Code analysis" [2]: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/managing-code-scanning-alerts/about-code-scanning-alerts?utm_source=chatgpt.com "About code scanning alerts" [3]: https://trivy.dev/docs/v0.56/scanner/misconfiguration/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Misconfiguration Scanning" [4]: https://edu.chainguard.dev/chainguard/chainguard-images/staying-secure/working-with-scanners/grype-tutorial/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Using Grype to Scan Software Artifacts" [5]: https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/prisma/cloud/cloud-code-security?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Cloud Code Security" [6]: https://docs.snyk.io/snyk-api/api-endpoints-index-and-tips/project-issue-paths-api-endpoints?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Project issue paths API endpoints" [7]: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/dependabot/dependabot-alerts/viewing-and-updating-dependabot-alerts?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Viewing and updating Dependabot alerts" [8]: https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy?utm_source=chatgpt.com "aquasecurity/trivy: Find vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, ..." [9]: https://docs.prismacloud.io/en/compute-edition/32/admin-guide/vulnerability-management/scan-reports?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Vulnerability Scan Reports - Prisma Cloud Documentation" [10]: https://docs.snyk.io/developer-tools/snyk-cli/commands/sbom?utm_source=chatgpt.com "SBOM" [11]: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/integrating-with-code-scanning/sarif-support-for-code-scanning?utm_source=chatgpt.com "SARIF support for code scanning" [12]: https://edu.chainguard.dev/chainguard/chainguard-images/staying-secure/working-with-scanners/trivy-tutorial/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Using Trivy to Scan Software Artifacts" [13]: https://docs.anchore.com/current/docs/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Anchore Enterprise Documentation" [14]: https://docs.snyk.io/manage-risk/prioritize-issues-for-fixing/ignore-issues/consistent-ignores-for-snyk-code?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Consistent Ignores for Snyk Code" [15]: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/managing-code-scanning-alerts/assessing-code-scanning-alerts-for-your-repository?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Assessing code scanning alerts for your repository" [16]: https://docs.prismacloud.io/en/enterprise-edition/content-collections/runtime-security/vulnerability-management/vulnerability-explorer?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Vulnerability Explorer - Prisma Cloud Documentation" [17]: https://docs.snyk.io/developer-tools/snyk-cli/commands/ignore?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Ignore | Snyk User Docs" [18]: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/managing-code-scanning-alerts/resolving-code-scanning-alerts?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Resolving code scanning alerts" [19]: https://aquasecurity.github.io/trivy-operator/v0.13.2/docs/vulnerability-scanning/trivy/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Trivy Scanner - Trivy Operator - Aqua Security" [20]: https://github.com/anchore/grype?utm_source=chatgpt.com "anchore/grype: A vulnerability scanner for container ..." [21]: https://docs.prismacloud.io/en/enterprise-edition/content-collections/application-security/risk-management/monitor-and-manage-code-build/suppress-code-issues?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Suppress Code Issues - Prisma Cloud Documentation" [22]: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/code-scanning/code-scanning?utm_source=chatgpt.com "REST API endpoints for code scanning" [23]: https://docs.anchore.com/current/docs/vulnerability_management/vuln_annotations/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Vulnerability Annotations and VEX" [24]: https://pan.dev/prisma-cloud/api/code/get-suppressions-justifications/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Get Suppressions Justifications by Policy ID and Query ..." [25]: https://snyk.io/blog/ignoring-vulnerabilities-with-snyk/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Ignoring vulnerabilities with Snyk" [26]: https://snyk.io/blog/advancing-sbom-standards-snyk-spdx/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Advancing SBOM standards: Snyk and SPDX" [27]: https://trivy.dev/docs/v0.50/supply-chain/vex/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "VEX" [28]: https://docs.snyk.io/manage-risk/prioritize-issues-for-fixing/ignore-issues?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Ignore issues | Snyk User Docs" [29]: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/dependabot/dependabot-auto-triage-rules/managing-automatically-dismissed-alerts?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Managing automatically dismissed alerts - Dependabot" [30]: https://artifacthub.io/packages/container/grype/grype?utm_source=chatgpt.com "grype latest · wagoodman@gmail.com/grype" [31]: https://docs.snyk.io/manage-risk/prioritize-issues-for-fixing/ignore-issues/exclude-files-and-ignore-issues-faqs?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Exclude files and ignore issues FAQs" [32]: https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy/discussions/7974?utm_source=chatgpt.com ".trivyignore.yaml not allow to ignore multiple vulnerabilities ..." [33]: https://github.com/anchore/grype/issues/2471?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Support using VEX documents with directory scans and ..." [34]: https://docs.snyk.io/manage-risk/reporting?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Reporting | Snyk User Docs" [35]: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/security-overview/filtering-alerts-in-security-overview?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Filtering alerts in security overview" [36]: https://www.aquasec.com/blog/container-vulnerability-management-best-practices/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Cloud Native Security Best Practices: Vulnerability Management" [37]: https://docs.anchore.com/current/docs/sbom_management/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "SBOM Management" [38]: https://docs.snyk.io/snyk-api/using-specific-snyk-apis/issues-list-issues-for-a-package?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Issues: List issues for a package" [39]: https://trivy.dev/docs/latest/configuration/reporting/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Reporting" [40]: https://pan.dev/prisma-cloud/api/cspm/vulnerabilities-search-api/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Get Vulnerabilities by RQL | Develop with Palo Alto Networks" [41]: https://docs.anchore.com/current/docs/release_notes/enterprise/5220/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Anchore Enterprise Release Notes - Version 5.22.0" [42]: https://docs.snyk.io/manage-risk/reporting/available-snyk-reports?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Available Snyk reports | Snyk User Docs" [43]: https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-cloud%40latest/rest/code-scanning/alert-dismissal-requests?utm_source=chatgpt.com "REST API endpoints for code scanning alert dismissal ..." [44]: https://updates.snyk.io/export-api-ga-release-321290/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Export API GA Release" [45]: https://securityboulevard.com/2025/11/anchore-enterprise-5-23-cyclonedx-vex-and-vdr-support/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Anchore Enterprise 5.23: CycloneDX VEX and VDR Support" [46]: https://docs.snyk.io/manage-risk/policies/the-.snyk-file?utm_source=chatgpt.com "The .snyk file | Snyk User Docs" Matrix built. I’ll keep it compact enough to scan quickly, but detailed enough that you can lift it straight into a Google Sheet / Confluence page. --- ## 1. Evidence & context: what a *single finding* looks like | Dimension | Snyk | GitHub Advanced Security | Aqua / Trivy | Anchore / Grype (Anchore Enterprise) | Prisma Cloud | | ----------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | **Code-level evidence** | Snyk Code shows a *Data flow* view (taint graph) from source → sink with step-by-step code lines in the UI and IDE. ([docs.snyk.io][1]) | Code scanning alerts show file/line and, for data-flow rules, a “how data moves through the code” view with **Show paths** for the full flow. ([GitHub Docs][2]) | Trivy is not a SAST engine; evidence is per-file / resource for vulnerabilities & misconfigurations (IaC, K8s, etc.), not data-flow graphs. ([Trivy][3]) | No SAST; evidence is package / image / SBOM level (CVE, package, version, location). Grype is focused on images/filesystems, not code flows. ([Chainguard Academy][4]) | AppSec module shows issues mapped to file & line and offers inline remediation/fix flows; surfaced in console and IDE plugins (JetBrains/VS Code). ([Palo Alto Networks][5]) | | **Dependency / container evidence** | For OSS & containers, Snyk shows dependency paths and has a **project issue paths** API that returns the introduction chain for a vuln. ([docs.snyk.io][6]) | Dependabot alerts show vulnerable package, version, advisories, and affected functions to help decide if code actually uses them. ([GitHub Docs][7]) | Trivy shows image → layer → package → vuln with installed/fixed versions; same for repos & filesystems in JSON/SARIF. ([GitHub][8]) | Grype output lists artifact, package, version, location, severity; when paired with Syft SBOM, you get full component graph for images and other artifacts. ([Chainguard Academy][4]) | Prisma’s Vulnerability Explorer & scan reports show image/host, package, severity and compliance IDs for image and host scans. ([docs.prismacloud.io][9]) | | **SBOM / supply-chain context** | `snyk sbom` generates CycloneDX and SPDX SBOMs for local projects; Snyk also supports SBOM export in enterprise tiers. ([docs.snyk.io][10]) | GitHub builds a dependency graph from manifests and ingests SARIF from external scanners; it is SBOM-adjacent but not an SBOM UI. ([GitHub Docs][11]) | Trivy can output SBOMs (CycloneDX, SPDX, SPDX-JSON) and Kubernetes “KBOM” views, and is often used as the SBOM generator. ([Chainguard Academy][12]) | Anchore Enterprise is explicitly “SBOM-powered”; SBOM management views let you navigate applications and export SBOM-centric vulnerability views. ([docs.anchore.com][13]) | Prisma Cloud is inventory-/RQL-centric; SBOMs are not a first-class UI artifact and there is no public doc for full SBOM navigation comparable to Anchore or Trivy. ([Palo Alto Networks][5]) | | **Where the evidence appears** | Web UI, CLI, IDEs (VS Code, JetBrains) and PR checks. Ignores for Snyk Code are now “consistent” across UI/CLI/IDE (2025-11 EA). ([docs.snyk.io][14]) | Web UI (Security tab), PR Conversation tab for code scanning reviews, REST & GraphQL APIs, and SARIF imports from many scanners. ([GitHub Docs][15]) | Trivy: CLI / JSON / SARIF / CI integrations (GitHub Actions, etc.). Aqua Platform adds a CNAPP UI with risk-based vulnerability views. ([GitHub][8]) | Grype: CLI & JSON/SARIF outputs; Anchore Enterprise: browser UI (dashboards, SBOM views, reporting) plus REST/GraphQL APIs. ([Chainguard Academy][4]) | Prisma Cloud: web console (AppSec dashboards, Vulnerability Explorer), REST APIs, IDE plugins for JetBrains & VS Code. ([docs.prismacloud.io][16]) | --- ## 2. Suppression / ignore / VEX behavior | Dimension | Snyk | GitHub Advanced Security | Aqua / Trivy | Anchore / Grype (Anchore Enterprise) | Prisma Cloud | | ---------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | **Suppression primitives** | `.snyk` policy file for OSS & container & IaC; `snyk ignore` CLI; “Ignore” in web UI; Snyk Code uses UI/CLI/IDE ignores but *not* `.snyk`. ([docs.snyk.io][17]) | Code scanning and Dependabot alerts can be **dismissed** with reasons; Dependabot has auto-triage rules (auto-dismiss/snooze). ([GitHub Docs][18]) | Trivy: `.trivyignore` / `.trivyignore.yaml` lists vuln IDs; `--ignore-policy` for Rego-based filtering; severity filters. ([aquasecurity.github.io][19]) | Grype: VEX-aware filtering via `--vex` and ignore rules; Anchore Enterprise: UI-driven vulnerability annotations that act as a structured “suppress or re-classify” layer. ([GitHub][20]) | AppSec: “Suppress Code Issues” (per-issue or globally) and more general suppression rules (disable policy / by source / by resource / by tag). ([docs.prismacloud.io][21]) | | **Metadata captured with suppression** | `snyk ignore` supports `--reason` and `--expiry`; UI shows who ignored and allows editing/unignore; APIs expose `ignoreReasons` on issues. ([docs.snyk.io][17]) | Dismissal reason: `false positive`, `won't fix`, `used in tests`; optional comment. Dismissal requests for code scanning add requester/reviewer, timestamps, status. ([GitHub Docs][22]) | Ignores live in repo-local files (`.trivyignore*`) or Rego policies; VEX documents contribute status metadata (per CVE, per product). No central UI metadata by default. ([aquasecurity.github.io][19]) | Annotations carry VEX-aligned status plus explanatory text; RBAC role `vuln-annotator-editor` controls who can create/modify/delete them. ([docs.anchore.com][23]) | Suppressions include justification text; there is a dedicated API to retrieve suppression justifications by policy ID and query (auditable). ([pan.dev][24]) | | **Scope & consistency** | Ignores are *local* to project/integration/org; ignoring in a Git repo project does not automatically ignore the same issue imported via CLI. Snyk Code ignore semantics differ from OSS/Container (no `.snyk`). ([Snyk][25]) | Dismissals attach to a specific alert (repo, branch baseline); PRs inherit baseline. Dependabot has repo-level config (`dependabot.yml`) and org-level alert configuration. ([GitHub Docs][7]) | Suppression is run-local: `.trivyignore` travels with source, policies live in config repos; VEX docs are attached per artifact or discovered via VEX Hub / registries. Reproducible but not centralized unless you build it. ([aquasecurity.github.io][19]) | Grype suppression is per scan & VEX document; Anchore Enterprise stores annotations centrally per artifact and exposes them consistently in UI/API and exported VEX. ([GitHub][20]) | Suppression rules can be global, per source, per resource, or tag-scoped; they affect console views and API results consistently when filters are applied. ([pan.dev][24]) | | **VEX support (ingest + semantics)** | Snyk generates SBOMs but has no documented first-class VEX ingestion or export; VEX is referenced mostly at the SBOM/standards level, not as a product feature. ([Snyk][26]) | No native VEX semantics in alerts; GitHub consumes SARIF only. VEX can exist in repos or external systems but is not interpreted by GHAS. ([GitHub Docs][11]) | Trivy has **explicit VEX support**: supports OpenVEX, CycloneDX VEX, and CSAF VEX, using local files, VEX repositories, SBOM externalReferences, and OCI VEX attestations to filter results. ([Trivy][27]) | Grype has VEX-first behavior: `--vex` to ingest OpenVEX; by default `not_affected`/`fixed` go to an ignore set; `--show-suppressed` exposes them. Anchore Enterprise 5.22+ adds OpenVEX export and CycloneDX VEX export (5.23). ([GitHub][20]) | No public documentation of native VEX ingestion or export; prioritization is via policies/RQL rather than VEX semantics. | | **Default handling of suppressed items** | Ignored issues are hidden by default in UI/CLI/IDE views to reduce noise; some tools like `snyk-to-html` will still show ignored Snyk Code issues. ([docs.snyk.io][28]) | Dismissed / auto-dismissed alerts are *not* shown by default (`is:open` filter); you must explicitly filter for closed / auto-dismissed alerts. ([GitHub Docs][29]) | When VEX is supplied, non-affected/fixed statuses are filtered out; suppressed entries are generally not shown unless you adjust filters/output. Some edge-cases exist around `.trivyignore.yaml` behavior. ([Trivy][27]) | Grype hides suppressed matches unless `--show-suppressed` is set; community discussions explicitly argue for “suppressed hidden by default” across all formats. ([artifacthub.io][30]) | Suppressed / excluded issues are hidden from normal risk views and searches and only visible via explicit filters or suppression APIs. ([pan.dev][24]) | | **Known pain points** | Fragmented semantics: Snyk Code vs OSS/Container vs IaC handle ignores differently; ignores are not global across ingest types. ([docs.snyk.io][31]) | Dismissal is per-tool: Dependabot rules don’t govern CodeQL and vice-versa; no VEX; you must build cross-tool policy on top. | Some rough edges reported around `.trivyignore.yaml` and SARIF vs exit-code behavior; VEX support is powerful but still labeled experimental in docs. ([GitHub][32]) | VEX support for certain source types (e.g., some directory + SBOM combos) has had bugs; suppressed entries disappear by default unless you remember `--show-suppressed`. ([GitHub][33]) | No VEX, and suppression semantics may diverge across CSPM/AppSec/Compute; complexity of RQL and multiple modules can make suppression strategy opaque without good governance. ([Palo Alto Networks][5]) | --- ## 3. Audit & export primitives | Dimension | Snyk | GitHub Advanced Security | Aqua / Trivy | Anchore / Grype (Anchore Enterprise) | Prisma Cloud | | ------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | **Built-in UI exports** | Reporting UI lets you export reports as PDF and table data as CSV; you can also download CSV from several report views. ([docs.snyk.io][34]) | UI is mostly “view only”; some security overview exports are available, but reports are usually built via API or marketplace actions (e.g., PDF report GitHub Action). ([GitHub Docs][35]) | Aqua Platform provides CSV exports and API integrations for vulnerability reports; on-prem deployments can export “user policy data, vulnerability data and system settings data.” ([Aqua][36]) | SBOM/Vulnerability views have an **Export CSV** button; the Reports service aggregates via GraphQL into CSV/JSON from pre-built templates and dashboards. ([docs.anchore.com][37]) | Vulnerability Explorer and scan reports allow CSV export; code-build issues can be exported with filters as CSV from the AppSec UI. ([docs.prismacloud.io][16]) | | **Machine-readable exports / APIs** | REST Issues API; Export API (GA) to create CSV exports via async jobs; SBOM CLI (`snyk sbom`) for CycloneDX/SPDX; audit log export for user actions. ([docs.snyk.io][38]) | SARIF input/output; REST & GraphQL APIs for code scanning & Dependabot; many third-party actions to transform alerts into PDFs/CSVs or send to other systems. ([GitHub Docs][11]) | Trivy outputs JSON, SARIF, CycloneDX, SPDX, SPDX-JSON, GitHub formats; these can be uploaded into GHAS or other platforms. Aqua exposes vulnerability data via API. ([Trivy][39]) | Grype outputs JSON, table, CycloneDX, SARIF, plus Go-template based CSV; Anchore Enterprise exposes APIs for vulnerabilities, policies, and reports. ([Chainguard Academy][4]) | CSPM/AppSec APIs: `vulnerabilities/search` (JSON) and `.../search/download` (GZIP CSV) for RQL queries; broader Prisma Cloud API for automation/integration. ([pan.dev][40]) | | **VEX / “authoritative statement” export** | No native VEX export; at best you can export SBOMs and issues and post-process into VEX with external tooling. ([Snyk][26]) | None. Vendors can publish VEX separately, but GHAS doesn’t emit VEX. | Trivy consumes VEX but does not itself author VEX; Aqua operates VEX Hub as a central repository of vendor VEX documents rather than as a generator. ([Trivy][27]) | Anchore Enterprise 5.22/5.23 is currently the most “productized” VEX exporter: OpenVEX and CycloneDX VEX including annotations, PURLs, metadata about the scanned image. ([docs.anchore.com][41]) | No VEX export; risk posture is expressed via internal policies, not standardized exploitability statements. | | **Suppression / ignore audit** | Ignored issues can be exported by filtering for “Ignored” in Reporting and downloading CSV; APIs expose ignore reasons; audit log export records user actions such as ignoring issues. ([docs.snyk.io][42]) | Code scanning dismissal requests are full audit records (who requested, who approved, reason, timestamps). Dependabot dismissal comments & auto-dismissed alerts are queryable via GraphQL/REST and UI filters. ([GitHub Docs][43]) | Auditability is repo-driven: `.trivyignore`/VEX/rego live in version control; Aqua’s own reporting/APIs can include current vulnerability state but do not (publicly) expose a dedicated VEX change log. ([aquasecurity.github.io][19]) | Annotations are first-class objects, controlled via RBAC and exportable as OpenVEX/CycloneDX VEX; this effectively *is* an audit log of “why we suppressed or downgraded this CVE” over time. ([docs.anchore.com][23]) | Suppression justification APIs provide a structured record of why and where policies are suppressed; combined with CSV/API exports of vulns, this gives a workable audit trail for regulators. ([pan.dev][24]) | --- ## 4. What this suggests for StellaOps UX & data-model ### Patterns worth copying 1. **Data-flow & path-level “evidence” as the default detail view** * Snyk Code’s taint-flow UI and GitHub’s “Show paths” for CodeQL alerts make a single issue *explain itself* without leaving the tool. ([docs.snyk.io][1]) * For StellaOps: * For code: provide a path graph (source → sanitizers → sinks) with line-level jumps. * For SBOM/containers: mirror Snyk’s Project Issue Paths & Grype/Syft by showing a dependency path or image-layer path for each CVE. 2. **VEX-first suppression semantics** * Trivy and Grype treat VEX as the *canonical* suppression mechanism; statuses like `not_affected` / `fixed` hide findings by default, with CLI flags to show suppressed. ([Trivy][27]) * Anchore Enterprise adds a full annotation workflow and emits OpenVEX/CycloneDX VEX as the authoritative vendor statement. ([docs.anchore.com][23]) * For StellaOps: make VEX status the **single source of truth** for suppression across all modules, and always be able to reconstruct a proof tree: SBOM → vuln → VEX statement → policy decision. 3. **Rich suppression metadata with explicit justification & expiry** * Snyk captures reason + expiry; GitHub uses structured reasons + free-form comment; Prisma provides a dedicated suppression-justification API. ([docs.snyk.io][17]) * For StellaOps: require a reason taxonomy + free-text + optional “proof link” (e.g., internal ticket, upstream vendor VEX) for any “Not Affected” or “Won’t Fix,” and store that as part of the public proof spine. 4. **Strong export & API stories for regulators** * Snyk’s Export API, Anchore’s Reports service, and Prisma’s RQL+CSV APIs give customers reliable machine-readable exports for audits and custom BI. ([updates.snyk.io][44]) * Anchore’s CycloneDX VEX export is the best current model for “signable, portable, regulator-friendly” proofs. ([Security Boulevard][45]) * For StellaOps: * Treat CSV/JSON/SBOM/VEX exports as *first-class* features, not add-ons. * Tie them to deterministic scan manifests and graph revision IDs (your “trust algebra” backbone) so an auditor can replay any historical report. 5. **Repo-local suppression files as “policy as code”** * `.snyk`, `.trivyignore`, Rego policies, and VEX docs living alongside source are proven patterns for reproducible suppression. ([docs.snyk.io][46]) * For StellaOps: mirror this with a small set of declarative files (`stellaops.vexmap.yaml`, `trust-lattice.yaml`) that your engine and UI both honor. ### Patterns to deliberately avoid 1. **Fragmented ignore semantics by scan type** * Snyk’s different behavior across Code vs OSS vs Container vs IaC (e.g., `.snyk` not honored for Snyk Code) is a recurring source of confusion. ([docs.snyk.io][31]) * For StellaOps: a single suppression model (VEX+policy) must apply consistently whether the evidence came from SAST, SBOM, container scan, or runtime telemetry. 2. **Making suppressed issues effectively invisible** * Grype and GitHub both hide suppressed/dismissed issues by default and require extra flags/filters to see them. ([artifacthub.io][30]) * For StellaOps: * Default UI for any artifact should show a small, always-visible “suppressed” counter with a click-through view. * Every export format should have an option to include suppressed entries with their VEX status and reasoning. 3. **Lack of a standard “authoritative statement” artifact** * Snyk, GitHub, Prisma Cloud all rely on internal notions of suppression and policy without emitting a standardized VEX or equivalent artifact. ([Snyk][26]) * For StellaOps: your “Proof-of-Integrity Graph” and VEX exports should be the primary way vendors and customers communicate risk, not just internal UI states. 4. **Over-reliance on informal text for serious decisions** * Many tools lean heavily on free-form comments (GitHub dismissal comments, Snyk ignore reasons) without tying them to structured policies or verifiable upstream evidence. ([GitHub Docs][22]) * For StellaOps: keep free text, but anchor it in structured fields (VEX status, justification category, linked upstream VEX/SBOM, ticket ID) and make these queryable across the entire system. If you want, next step can be a **StellaOps UX spec** that maps each of these rows to concrete screens and micro-interactions (e.g., “Finding details drawer,” “Suppression dialog,” “Export / attest dialog”) so your .NET/Angular team has something they can implement directly. [1]: https://docs.snyk.io/scan-with-snyk/snyk-code/manage-code-vulnerabilities/breakdown-of-code-analysis?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Breakdown of Code analysis" [2]: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/managing-code-scanning-alerts/about-code-scanning-alerts?utm_source=chatgpt.com "About code scanning alerts" [3]: https://trivy.dev/docs/v0.56/scanner/misconfiguration/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Misconfiguration Scanning" [4]: https://edu.chainguard.dev/chainguard/chainguard-images/staying-secure/working-with-scanners/grype-tutorial/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Using Grype to Scan Software Artifacts" [5]: https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/prisma/cloud/cloud-code-security?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Cloud Code Security" [6]: https://docs.snyk.io/snyk-api/api-endpoints-index-and-tips/project-issue-paths-api-endpoints?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Project issue paths API endpoints" [7]: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/dependabot/dependabot-alerts/viewing-and-updating-dependabot-alerts?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Viewing and updating Dependabot alerts" [8]: https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy?utm_source=chatgpt.com "aquasecurity/trivy: Find vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, ..." [9]: https://docs.prismacloud.io/en/compute-edition/32/admin-guide/vulnerability-management/scan-reports?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Vulnerability Scan Reports - Prisma Cloud Documentation" [10]: https://docs.snyk.io/developer-tools/snyk-cli/commands/sbom?utm_source=chatgpt.com "SBOM" [11]: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/integrating-with-code-scanning/sarif-support-for-code-scanning?utm_source=chatgpt.com "SARIF support for code scanning" [12]: https://edu.chainguard.dev/chainguard/chainguard-images/staying-secure/working-with-scanners/trivy-tutorial/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Using Trivy to Scan Software Artifacts" [13]: https://docs.anchore.com/current/docs/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Anchore Enterprise Documentation" [14]: https://docs.snyk.io/manage-risk/prioritize-issues-for-fixing/ignore-issues/consistent-ignores-for-snyk-code?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Consistent Ignores for Snyk Code" [15]: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/managing-code-scanning-alerts/assessing-code-scanning-alerts-for-your-repository?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Assessing code scanning alerts for your repository" [16]: https://docs.prismacloud.io/en/enterprise-edition/content-collections/runtime-security/vulnerability-management/vulnerability-explorer?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Vulnerability Explorer - Prisma Cloud Documentation" [17]: https://docs.snyk.io/developer-tools/snyk-cli/commands/ignore?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Ignore | Snyk User Docs" [18]: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/managing-code-scanning-alerts/resolving-code-scanning-alerts?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Resolving code scanning alerts" [19]: https://aquasecurity.github.io/trivy-operator/v0.13.2/docs/vulnerability-scanning/trivy/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Trivy Scanner - Trivy Operator - Aqua Security" [20]: https://github.com/anchore/grype?utm_source=chatgpt.com "anchore/grype: A vulnerability scanner for container ..." [21]: https://docs.prismacloud.io/en/enterprise-edition/content-collections/application-security/risk-management/monitor-and-manage-code-build/suppress-code-issues?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Suppress Code Issues - Prisma Cloud Documentation" [22]: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/code-scanning/code-scanning?utm_source=chatgpt.com "REST API endpoints for code scanning" [23]: https://docs.anchore.com/current/docs/vulnerability_management/vuln_annotations/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Vulnerability Annotations and VEX" [24]: https://pan.dev/prisma-cloud/api/code/get-suppressions-justifications/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Get Suppressions Justifications by Policy ID and Query ..." [25]: https://snyk.io/blog/ignoring-vulnerabilities-with-snyk/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Ignoring vulnerabilities with Snyk" [26]: https://snyk.io/blog/advancing-sbom-standards-snyk-spdx/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Advancing SBOM standards: Snyk and SPDX" [27]: https://trivy.dev/docs/v0.50/supply-chain/vex/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "VEX" [28]: https://docs.snyk.io/manage-risk/prioritize-issues-for-fixing/ignore-issues?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Ignore issues | Snyk User Docs" [29]: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/dependabot/dependabot-auto-triage-rules/managing-automatically-dismissed-alerts?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Managing automatically dismissed alerts - Dependabot" [30]: https://artifacthub.io/packages/container/grype/grype?utm_source=chatgpt.com "grype latest · wagoodman@gmail.com/grype" [31]: https://docs.snyk.io/manage-risk/prioritize-issues-for-fixing/ignore-issues/exclude-files-and-ignore-issues-faqs?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Exclude files and ignore issues FAQs" [32]: https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy/discussions/7974?utm_source=chatgpt.com ".trivyignore.yaml not allow to ignore multiple vulnerabilities ..." [33]: https://github.com/anchore/grype/issues/2471?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Support using VEX documents with directory scans and ..." [34]: https://docs.snyk.io/manage-risk/reporting?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Reporting | Snyk User Docs" [35]: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/security-overview/filtering-alerts-in-security-overview?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Filtering alerts in security overview" [36]: https://www.aquasec.com/blog/container-vulnerability-management-best-practices/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Cloud Native Security Best Practices: Vulnerability Management" [37]: https://docs.anchore.com/current/docs/sbom_management/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "SBOM Management" [38]: https://docs.snyk.io/snyk-api/using-specific-snyk-apis/issues-list-issues-for-a-package?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Issues: List issues for a package" [39]: https://trivy.dev/docs/latest/configuration/reporting/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Reporting" [40]: https://pan.dev/prisma-cloud/api/cspm/vulnerabilities-search-api/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Get Vulnerabilities by RQL | Develop with Palo Alto Networks" [41]: https://docs.anchore.com/current/docs/release_notes/enterprise/5220/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Anchore Enterprise Release Notes - Version 5.22.0" [42]: https://docs.snyk.io/manage-risk/reporting/available-snyk-reports?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Available Snyk reports | Snyk User Docs" [43]: https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-cloud%40latest/rest/code-scanning/alert-dismissal-requests?utm_source=chatgpt.com "REST API endpoints for code scanning alert dismissal ..." [44]: https://updates.snyk.io/export-api-ga-release-321290/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Export API GA Release" [45]: https://securityboulevard.com/2025/11/anchore-enterprise-5-23-cyclonedx-vex-and-vdr-support/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Anchore Enterprise 5.23: CycloneDX VEX and VDR Support" [46]: https://docs.snyk.io/manage-risk/policies/the-.snyk-file?utm_source=chatgpt.com "The .snyk file | Snyk User Docs" I’ll treat this as a concrete UX blueprint your .NET/Angular team can build against, centered on three pillars: 1. Evidence views (how a single finding “explains itself”) 2. Suppression/VEX (how risk decisions are captured) 3. Audit/export (how you prove those decisions later) --- ## 1. Design principles specific to StellaOps 1. **Graph-first:** Every view is anchored to a graph snapshot ID from your trust algebra / proof engine. Users always know “which build / which graph revision” they’re looking at. 2. **Single suppression model:** One suppression semantics layer (VEX + policy) across code, SBOM, containers, and runtime. 3. **Evidence before opinion:** Detail views always show raw evidence (paths, SBOM lines, runtime traces) before risk ratings, policies, or comments. 4. **Audit-ready by default:** Any action that changes risk posture automatically leaves a machine-readable trail that can be exported. --- ## 2. Core information architecture Primary entities in the UX (mirroring your backend): * **Organization / Workspace** * **Application / Service** * **Artifact** * Build (commit, tag, CI run) * Container image * Binary / package * SBOM document * **Scan Result** * Scanner type (SAST, SCA, container, SBOM-only, IaC, runtime) * Graph snapshot ID * **Finding** * Vulnerability (CVE, GHSA, etc.) * Misconfiguration / policy violation * Supply-chain anomaly * **Evidence** * Code path(s) * Dependency path(s) * SBOM node(s) * Runtime event(s) * **VEX Statement** * Status (`affected`, `not_affected`, `fixed`, `under_investigation`, etc.) * Justification (standardized + free text) * **Suppression Decision** * “Suppressed by VEX”, “De-prioritized by policy”, “Won’t fix”, etc. * **Export Job / Proof Bundle** * **Audit Event** * Who, what, when, against which graph snapshot The UI should surface these without drowning the user in jargon: names can be friendlier but map cleanly to this model. --- ## 3. UX spec by primary flows ### 3.1 Landing: Inventory & posture overview **Screen: “Inventory & Risk Overview”** Purpose: Secure default entry point for security engineers and auditors. Layout: * **Header bar** * Org selector * Global search (by application, artifact, CVE, VEX ID, SBOM component) * “Exports & Proofs” shortcut * User menu * **Left nav (primary)** * Inventory * Findings * VEX & Policies * Exports & Proofs * Settings * **Main content: 3 panels** 1. **Applications list** * Columns: Name, Owner, #Artifacts, Open findings, Suppressed findings, Last build, Risk score. * Row click → Application view. 2. **Top risks** * Cards: “Critical vulns”, “Unsigned artifacts”, “Unknown SBOM coverage”, each showing counts and a “View findings” link (pre-filtered). 3. **Compliance viewpoint** * Tabs: “Operational”, “Regulatory”, “Attestations”. * Simple status indicators per framework (e.g., SLSA level, NIST SSDF coverage) if you support that. Micro-interactions: * Clicking any numeric count (e.g., “12 suppressed”) opens a pre-filtered Findings list. * Hover tooltip on risk counts shows breakdown by source (SAST vs SBOM vs runtime). --- ### 3.2 Application & artifact detail: evidence-centric view **Screen: “Application detail”** Purpose: Navigate from high level risk to specific artifacts and findings. Layout: * Tabs: Overview | Artifacts | Findings | SBOM graph | History **Overview tab:** * Top: Application summary (owners, repos, deployment targets). * Middle: Tiles for “Latest build”, “Prod artifacts”, “SBOM coverage”. * Bottom: “Recent decisions” timeline (suppression, VEX updates, exports). **Artifacts tab:** * Table with: * Artifact type (image, binary, SBOM-only) * Identifier (tag/digest, CI job ID) * Environment (dev, staging, prod) * Graph snapshot ID * Findings (open / suppressed chips) * Last scanned Selecting a row opens **Artifact detail**. --- ### 3.3 Artifact detail & Finding details drawer **Screen: “Artifact detail”** Layout: * Header: * Artifact identity (name, version/tag, digest) * Environment badges * Graph snapshot ID with “Copy” control * Primary actions: “Download SBOM”, “Export proof bundle” * Sub-tabs: * Findings * Evidence graph * SBOM tree * History **Findings sub-tab** * Filters on left: * Severity, status (Open / Suppressed / Only suppressed), source (SAST/SBOM/container/runtime), VEX status, CWE/CVE. * Table in center: * Columns: Severity, Type, ID (CVE-XXXX-XXXX), Component/Code location, Status (Open/Suppressed), VEX status, Last updated. * Row click opens a **Finding details drawer** sliding from the right. **Finding details drawer (core evidence UX)** This is the primary place where “evidence explains itself.” Structure: 1. **Header area** * Title: “CVE-2023-XXXX in `openssl`” * Badges: severity, status (Open / Suppressed by VEX), VEX status (`not_affected`, `fixed`, etc.) * Scope indicator: where this finding appears (e.g., “1 artifact (this), 3 environments, 2 images”). 2. **Tabs within drawer** * **Evidence** (default) * Section: “Where this comes from” * Scanner source, scan timestamp, graph snapshot ID. * Section: “Code path” (for SAST) * A vertical list of steps: `source` → `propagation` → `sink`. * Clicking a step shows code snippet with line highlighting. * “Open in Git” and “Open in IDE (deeplink)” actions. * Section: “Dependency path” (for SCA / SBOM) * Path view: `app -> module -> transitive dependency -> vulnerable package`. * Option to switch between “tree view” and “collapsed chain”. * Section: “Runtime signals” (if available) * Call-site frequency, exploit attempts, telemetry tags. * **Impact & reach** * A small graph panel: how many artifacts, environments, and applications share this finding. * Link: “View all affected artifacts” → filtered Findings view. * **VEX & decisions** * Shows current VEX statements attached: * Table: Status, Justification (standardized), Source (vendor vs internal), Effective scope (artifact / app / org), Last changed by. * Shows local suppression decisions beyond VEX (e.g., “De-prioritized due to compensating controls”). * Primary action: “Update status / Add VEX decision”. * **History** * Timeline of events for this finding: * Detected * VEX attached/updated * Suppression added/edited * Exported in bundles (with links) * Each item shows user, timestamp, and delta. Micro-interactions: * The drawer should support deep-linking: URL reflects `artifactId + findingId + snapshotId`. * Keyboard: `Esc` closes drawer, `←` / `→` cycles findings in the table. --- ## 4. Suppression & VEX UX Goal: one consistent model across all scan types, anchored in VEX semantics. ### 4.1 “Update status / Add VEX decision” dialog Entry points: * From Finding details drawer > “VEX & decisions” tab > primary button. * Bulk selection from Findings table > “Update status”. Dialog steps (single modal with progressive disclosure): 1. **Select decision type** Radio options: * “System is affected” * Sub-options: `under_investigation`, `affected_no_fix_available`, `affected_fix_available`. * “System is *not* affected” * Sub-options (justification): `vulnerable_code_not_present`, `vulnerable_code_not_in_execute_path`, `vulnerable_configuration_not_present`, `inline_mitigation_applied`, `other`. * “Fixed” * Sub-options: `fixed_in_this_version`, `fixed_in_downstream`, `fixed_by_vendor`. * “Won’t fix / accepted risk” * Sub-options: `business_acceptance`, `low_likelihood`, `temporary_exception`. 2. **Scope definition** Checkboxes + selectors: * Scope: * [x] This artifact only * [ ] All artifacts of this application * [ ] All artifacts in this org with the same component & version * For each, display a short estimate: “This will apply to 3 artifacts (click to preview).” 3. **Metadata** * Required: * Justification category (if not chosen above). * Free-text “Reason / supporting evidence” (min length e.g., 20 characters). * Optional: * Expiry date (for temporary exceptions). * Link to ticket / document (URL). * Attach external VEX file ID or reference (if you’ve ingested vendor VEX). 4. **Output preview** A read-only JSON-like preview of the VEX statement(s) to be generated, with a friendly label: “These statements will be added to the proof graph for snapshot XYZ.” This makes the model transparent to power users. On submit: * Show a small toast: “Status updated · VEX statement anchored to snapshot [ID] · Undo” (undo limited to a short window). * The Finding row and drawer update immediately (status badges, history timeline). ### 4.2 Bulk suppression & policy overlay **Screen: “VEX & Policies”** Tabs: 1. **VEX statements** * Table: VEX ID, CVE/ID, Status, Scope, Created by, Last updated, Source (vendor/internal). * Filters: status, scope, target (component, application, artifact). * Bulk actions: Export VEX (OpenVEX / CycloneDX VEX), disable / supersede. 2. **Policies** * Declarative rules like: “Treat `vulnerable_code_not_present` from vendor X as authoritative” or “Do not auto-suppress based on `inline_mitigation_applied` without internal confirmation.” * This expresses how raw VEX translates into “suppressed” vs “needs review” in the UI. UX pattern: * Each VEX row includes a small indicator: `S` (suppresses findings under current policy) or `R` (requires review). * Clicking a row opens a side drawer with: * Statements content (normalized). * Affected findings count. * Policy evaluation result (“This statement currently suppresses 47 findings”). --- ## 5. Findings list: global “inbox” for risk **Screen: “Findings”** This is the cross-application queue, similar to Snyk’s project list + GitHub’s security tab, but with VEX semantics. Layout: * Filters on the left: * Application / artifact * Severity * Status (Open / Suppressed / Only suppressed / Needs review) * VEX status * Source (SAST, SBOM, container, runtime) * Table in center: * Columns: Severity, ID, Application, Artifact, Status, VEX status, “Decision owner” (user or team), Age. * Top bar: * “Assign to…” for workflow * “Update status / Add VEX decision” for bulk * “Export current view” (CSV/JSON) Micro-interactions: * “Status” column clearly distinguishes: * Open (no VEX) * Open (VEX says `affected`) * Suppressed (VEX says `not_affected` / `fixed`) * Suppressed (policy exception: “Won’t fix”) * Hover on “Suppressed” shows a tooltip with the justification and who made the decision. --- ## 6. Audit & export / Proof bundles ### 6.1 Exports list **Screen: “Exports & Proofs”** Purpose: centralized, auditable place for generating and revisiting proofs. Layout: * Top actions: * “New export / proof bundle” * Filters: type (CSV, JSON, SBOM, VEX, composite bundle), created by, status. * Table: * Name / description * Type (e.g., “OpenVEX for app ‘payments’”, “Proof bundle for prod rollout 2025-03-01”) * Scope (org / app / artifact / snapshot range) * Includes suppressed? (Yes/No) * Status (Complete / Failed) * Created by, Created at * Download button ### 6.2 “New export / proof bundle” flow 1. **What do you need?** Choices: * SBOM export (CycloneDX/SPDX) * VEX export (OpenVEX / CycloneDX VEX) * Findings export (CSV / JSON) * Proof bundle (zip containing SBOM + VEX + findings + manifest) 2. **Scope** * Radio: * A single artifact (picker) * All artifacts of an application (picker) * Entire org, limited by: * Time window (from..to) * Environments (prod only / all) * Optional: choose graph snapshot(s) (latest vs explicit ID). 3. **Options** * Include suppressed findings: * [x] Yes, include them, with reasons * [ ] No, only unresolved * Mask sensitive fields? (e.g., repository URLs) * Include audit log excerpt: * [x] VEX & suppression decisions * [ ] All user actions 4. **Review & create** * Show a summary: * N artifacts, M findings, K VEX statements. * Button: “Create export”. Once complete: * Row in the table is updated with a download button. * Clicking a row opens an **Export detail drawer**: * Manifest preview (JSON-like). * Link to the associated graph snapshot IDs. * Embedded notice that “Regulators can verify this bundle by validating manifest signature and graph snapshot hash” (if you sign them). Micro-interaction: * For artifacts and applications, the Artifact detail and Application detail pages should have contextual buttons: * “Export SBOM” * “Export VEX” * “Download proof bundle” These open the same export dialog pre-populated with the relevant scope. --- ## 7. History & audit trail UX Audit must be first-class, not buried. **Pattern: Timeline component** Used in: * Application > History * Artifact > History * Finding > History * VEX statement > History * Export > Details Timeline item shape: * Icon (type of action: scan, decision, export) * Title (short, human readable) * Metadata: * User * Timestamp * Graph snapshot ID * Detail: * Before/after summary (e.g., “VEX status: `affected` → `not_affected`”) Filters: * By actor (user / system) * By action type (scan, VEX change, suppression, export, policy change) * By time range Long-term: this timeline can become your “forensic report” generator. --- ## 8. Role-based slices You can keep a single UX codebase but offer different “home” experiences per role. 1. **Security engineer** * Default landing: “Findings” with open & needs-review filters. * Emphasis on Evidence & VEX decisions. * Quick actions: create VEX, adjust policies. 2. **Developer** * Default landing: “My assignments” (subset of Findings where they’re the owner). * Simplified VEX dialog: * Emphasis on “Fixed in commit X” and “Provide more evidence” rather than full-blown VEX authoring. * Tight links to repo/IDE. 3. **Auditor / Compliance** * Default landing: “Exports & Proofs”. * Views oriented around applications and time windows, not individual findings. * Read-only access to VEX & policies; can request evidence rather than editing it. Role behavior is enforced by RBAC, but the UX is guided by ship-ready presets. --- ## 9. Implementation checklist for your .NET/Angular team To make this action-ready: 1. **Routes / pages** * `/inventory` * `/applications/:appId` * `/artifacts/:artifactId` * `/findings` * `/vex` * `/exports` * `/settings` 2. **Core reusable components** * Graph snapshot badge (with copy & deeplink). * Findings table (configurable columns, selection). * Finding details drawer (tabs: Evidence / Impact / VEX & decisions / History). * VEX status badge. * Timeline component. * Export job dialog & list. 3. **API contracts to align with UX** * `GET /artifacts/:id/findings?snapshot=...` * `GET /findings/:id?includeEvidence=true` * `POST /vex/statements` (supports scoped statements). * `GET /vex/statements?filters...` * `POST /exports` + `GET /exports/:id` * `GET /audit?scopeType=&scopeId=&range=...` 4. **Deep-linking** * URLs should embed at least `snapshotId` for deterministic views: * `/artifacts/:artifactId/findings/:findingId?snapshot=:snapshotId` 5. **Telemetry for UX refinement** * Track frequency of: * Evidence tab switches (Code vs Dependency vs Runtime). * VEX edits per finding. * Export jobs by type. * Use this to prioritize which evidence views to optimize first. --- If you want a next step, I can translate this into: * A low-fidelity screen map (per route, per component), or * An example JSON schema for VEX statements + proof bundles that matches the UI’s expectations, so your backend and frontend teams can converge on a single contract.