add advisories

docs/product-advisories/05-Dec-2025 - Designing Triage UX That Stays Quiet on Purpose.md

@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+I thought you might find these recent developments useful — they directly shape the competitive landscape and highlight where a tool like “Stella Ops” could stand out.
+
+Here’s a quick run‑through of what’s happening — and where you could try to create advantage.
+
+---
+
+## 🔎 What competitors have recently shipped (competitive cues)
+
+* Snyk Open Source recently rolled out a new **“dependency‑grouped” default view**, shifting from listing individual vulnerabilities to grouping them by library + version, so that you see the full impact of an upgrade (i.e. how many vulnerabilities a single library bump would remediate). ([updates.snyk.io][1])
+* Prisma Cloud (via its Vulnerability Explorer) now supports **Code‑to‑Cloud tracing**, meaning runtime vulnerabilities in container images or deployed assets can be traced back to the originating code/package in source repositories. ([docs.prismacloud.io][2])
+* Prisma Cloud also emphasizes **contextual risk scoring** that factors in risk elements beyond raw CVE severity — e.g. exposure, deployment context, asset type — to prioritize what truly matters. ([Palo Alto Networks][3])
+
+These moves reflect a clear shift from “just list vulnerabilities” to “give actionable context and remediation clarity.”
+
+---
+
+## 🚀 Where to build stronger differentiation (your conceptual moats)
+
+Given what others have done, there’s now a window to own features that go deeper than “scan + score.” I think the following conceptual differentiators could give a tool like yours a strong, defensible edge:
+
+* **“Stack‑Trace Lens”** — produce a first‑repro (or first‑hit) path from root cause to sink: show exactly how a vulnerability flows from a vulnerable library/line of code into a vulnerable runtime or container. That gives clarity developers rarely get from typical SCA/CSPM dashboards.
+* **“VEX Receipt” sidebar** — for issues flagged but deemed non‑exploitable (e.g. mitigated by runtime guards, configuration, or because the code path isn’t reachable), show a structured explanation for *why* it’s safe. That helps reduce noise, foster trust, and defensibly suppress “false positives” while retaining an audit trail.
+* **“Noise Ledger”** — an audit log of all suppressions, silences, or de‑prioritisations. If later the environment changes (e.g. a library bump, configuration change, or new code), you can re‑evaluate suppressed risks — or easily re‑enable previously suppressed issues.
+
+---
+
+## 💡 Why this matters — and where “Stella Ops” can shine
+
+Because leading tools are increasingly offering dependency‑group grouping and risk‑scored vulnerability ranking + code‑to‑cloud tracing, the baseline expectation from users is rising: they don’t just want scans — they want *actionable clarity*.
+
+By building lenses (traceability), receipts (rationalized suppressions), and auditability (reversible noise control), you move from “noise‑heavy scanning” to **“security as insight & governance”** — which aligns cleanly with your ambitions around deterministic scanning, compliance‑ready SBOM/VEX, and long‑term traceability.
+
+You could position “Stella Ops” not as “another scanner,” but as a **governance‑grade, trace‑first, compliance‑centric security toolkit** — something that outpaces both SCA‑focused and cloud‑context tools by unifying them under auditability, trust, and clarity.
+
+---
+
+If you like, I can sketch a **draft competitive matrix** (Snyk vs Prisma Cloud vs Stella Ops) showing exactly which features you beat them on — that might help when you write your positioning.
+
+[1]: https://updates.snyk.io/group-by-dependency-a-new-view-for-snyk-open-source-319578/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Group by Dependency: A New View for Snyk Open Source"
+[2]: https://docs.prismacloud.io/en/enterprise-edition/content-collections/search-and-investigate/c2c-tracing-vulnerabilities/c2c-tracing-vulnerabilities?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Code to Cloud Tracing for Vulnerabilities"
+[3]: https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/prisma/cloud/vulnerability-management?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Vulnerability Management"
+To make Stella Ops feel *meaningfully* better than “scan + score” tools, lean into three advantages that compound over time: **traceability**, **explainability**, and **auditability**. Here’s a deeper, more buildable version of the ideas (and a few adjacent moats that reinforce them).
+
+---
+
+## 1) Stack‑Trace Lens → “Show me the exploit path, not the CVE”
+
+**Promise:** “This vuln matters because *this* request route can reach *that* vulnerable function under *these* runtime conditions.”
+
+### What it looks like in product
+
+* **Exploit Path View** (per finding)
+
+  * Entry point: API route / job / message topic / cron
+  * Call chain: `handler → service → lib.fn() → vulnerable sink`
+  * **Reachability verdict:** reachable / likely reachable / not reachable (with rationale)
+  * **Runtime gates:** feature flag off, auth wall, input constraints, WAF, env var, etc.
+* **“Why this is risky” panel**
+
+  * Severity + exploit maturity + exposure (internet-facing?) + privilege required
+  * But crucially: **show the factors**, don’t hide behind a single score.
+
+### How this becomes a moat (harder to copy)
+
+* You’re building a **code + dependency + runtime graph** that improves with every build/deploy.
+* Competitors can map “package ↔ image ↔ workload”; fewer can answer “*can user input reach the vulnerable code path?*”
+
+### Killer demo
+
+Pick a noisy transitive dependency CVE.
+
+* Stella shows: “Not reachable: the vulnerable function isn’t invoked in your codebase. Here’s the nearest call site; it dead-ends.”
+* Then show a second CVE where it *is* reachable, with a path that ends at a public endpoint. The contrast sells.
+
+---
+
+## 2) VEX Receipt → “Suppressions you can defend”
+
+**Promise:** When you say “won’t fix” or “not affected,” Stella produces a **structured, portable explanation** that stands up in audits and survives team churn.
+
+### What a “receipt” contains
+
+* Vulnerability ID(s), component + version, where detected (SBOM node)
+* **Status:** affected / not affected / under investigation
+* **Justification template** (pick one, pre-filled where possible):
+
+  * Not in execution path (reachability)
+  * Mitigated by configuration (e.g., feature disabled, safe defaults)
+  * Environment not vulnerable (e.g., OS/arch mismatch)
+  * Only dev/test dependency
+  * Patched downstream / backported fix
+* **Evidence attachments** (hashable)
+
+  * Call graph snippet, config snapshot, runtime trace, build attestation reference
+* **Owner + approver + expiry**
+
+  * “This expires in 90 days unless re-approved”
+* **Reopen triggers**
+
+  * “If this package version changes” / “if this endpoint becomes public” / “if config flag flips”
+
+### Why it’s a competitive advantage
+
+* Most tools offer “ignore” or “risk accept.” Few make it **portable governance**.
+* The receipt becomes a **memory system** for security decisions, not a pile of tribal knowledge.
+
+### Killer demo
+
+Open a SOC2/ISO audit scenario:
+
+* “Why is this critical CVE not fixed?”
+  Stella: click → receipt → evidence → approver → expiry → automatically scheduled revalidation.
+
+---
+
+## 3) Noise Ledger → “Safe noise reduction without blind spots”
+
+**Promise:** You can reduce noise aggressively *without* creating a security black hole.
+
+### What to build
+
+* A first-class **Suppression Object**
+
+  * Scope (repo/service/env), matching logic, owner, reason, risk rating, expiry
+  * Links to receipts (VEX) when applicable
+* **Suppression Drift Detection**
+
+  * If conditions change (new code path, new exposure, new dependency graph), Stella flags:
+
+    * “This suppression is now invalid”
+* **Suppression Debt dashboard**
+
+  * How many suppressions exist
+  * How many expired
+  * How many are blocking remediation
+  * “Top 10 suppressions by residual risk”
+
+### Why it wins
+
+* Teams want fewer alerts. Auditors want rigor. The ledger gives both.
+* It also creates a **governance flywheel**: each suppression forces a structured rationale, which improves the product’s prioritization later.
+
+---
+
+## 4) Deterministic Scanning → “Same inputs, same outputs (and provable)”
+
+This is subtle but huge for trust.
+
+### Buildable elements
+
+* **Pinned scanner/toolchain versions** per org, per policy pack
+* **Reproducible scan artifacts**
+
+  * Results are content-addressed (hash), signed, and versioned
+* **Diff-first UX**
+
+  * “What changed since last build?” is the default view:
+
+    * new findings / resolved / severity changes / reachability changes
+* **Stable finding IDs**
+
+  * The same issue stays the same issue across refactors, so workflows don’t rot.
+
+### Why it’s hard to copy
+
+* Determinism is a *systems* choice (pipelines + data model + UI). It’s not a feature toggle.
+
+---
+
+## 5) Remediation Planner → “Best fix set, minimal breakage”
+
+Competitors often say “upgrade X.” Stella can say “Here’s the *smallest set of changes* that removes the most risk.”
+
+### What it does
+
+* **Upgrade simulation**
+
+  * “If you bump `libA` to 2.3, you eliminate 14 vulns but introduce 1 breaking change risk”
+* **Patch plan**
+
+  * Ordered steps, test guidance, rollout suggestions
+* **Campaign mode**
+
+  * One CVE → many repos/services → coordinated PRs + tracking
+
+### Why it wins
+
+* Reduces time-to-fix by turning vulnerability work into an **optimization problem**, not a scavenger hunt.
+
+---
+
+## 6) “Audit Pack” Mode → instant compliance evidence
+
+**Promise:** “Give me evidence for this control set for the last 90 days.”
+
+### Contents
+
+* SBOM + VEX exports (per release)
+* Exception receipts + approvals + expiries
+* Policy results + change history
+* Attestation references tying code → artifact → deploy
+
+This is how you position Stella Ops as **governance-grade**, not just developer-grade.
+
+---
+
+## 7) Open standards + portability as a wedge (without being “open-source-y”)
+
+Make it easy to *leave*—ironically, that increases trust and adoption.
+
+* SBOM: SPDX/CycloneDX exports
+* VEX: OpenVEX/CycloneDX VEX outputs
+* Attestations: in-toto/SLSA-style provenance references (even if you don’t implement every spec day one)
+
+The advantage: “Your security posture is not trapped in our UI.”
+
+---
+
+## 8) The positioning that ties it together
+
+A crisp way to frame Stella Ops:
+
+* **Snyk-like:** finds issues fast.
+* **Prisma-like:** adds runtime/cloud context.
+* **Stella Ops:** turns findings into **defensible decisions** with **traceable evidence**, and keeps those decisions correct as the system changes.
+
+If you want a north-star tagline that matches the above:
+
+* **“Security you can prove.”**
+* **“From CVEs to verifiable decisions.”**
+
+---
+
+### Three “hero workflows” that sell all of this in one demo
+
+1. **New CVE drops** → impact across deployments → exploit path → fix set → PRs → rollout tracking
+2. **Developer sees a finding** → Stack-Trace Lens explains why it matters → one-click remediation plan
+3. **Auditor asks** → Audit Pack + VEX receipts + ledger shows governance end-to-end
+
+If you want, I can turn this into a one-page competitive matrix (Snyk / Prisma / Stella Ops) plus a recommended MVP cut that still preserves the moats (the parts that are hardest to copy).