docs(sprint-3500.0004.0004): Complete documentation handoff
Sprint 3500.0004.0004 (Documentation & Handoff) - COMPLETE Training Materials (T5 DONE): - epic-3500-faq.md: Comprehensive FAQ for Score Proofs/Reachability - video-tutorial-scripts.md: 6 video tutorial scripts - Training guides already existed from prior work Release Notes (T6 DONE): - v2.5.0-release-notes.md: Full release notes with breaking changes, upgrade instructions, and performance benchmarks OpenAPI Specs (T7 DONE): - Scanner OpenAPI already comprehensive with ProofSpines, Unknowns, CallGraphs, Reachability endpoints and schemas Handoff Checklist (T8 DONE): - epic-3500-handoff-checklist.md: Complete handoff documentation including sign-off tracking, escalation paths, monitoring config All 8/8 tasks complete. Sprint DONE. Epic 3500 documentation deliverables complete.
This commit is contained in:
543
docs/training/epic-3500-faq.md
Normal file
543
docs/training/epic-3500-faq.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,543 @@
|
||||
# Epic 3500: Score Proofs & Reachability FAQ
|
||||
|
||||
**Sprint:** SPRINT_3500_0004_0004
|
||||
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-20
|
||||
|
||||
This FAQ covers the most common questions about Score Proofs, Reachability Analysis, and Unknowns Management features introduced in Epic 3500.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Table of Contents
|
||||
|
||||
1. [General Questions](#general-questions)
|
||||
2. [Score Proofs](#score-proofs)
|
||||
3. [Reachability Analysis](#reachability-analysis)
|
||||
4. [Unknowns Queue](#unknowns-queue)
|
||||
5. [Integration & Deployment](#integration--deployment)
|
||||
6. [Performance](#performance)
|
||||
7. [Troubleshooting](#troubleshooting)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## General Questions
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What is Epic 3500?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Epic 3500 introduces three major capabilities to StellaOps:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Score Proofs**: Cryptographically verifiable attestations proving that vulnerability scores are deterministic and reproducible
|
||||
2. **Reachability Analysis**: Static analysis determining whether vulnerable code paths are actually reachable from your application
|
||||
3. **Unknowns Management**: Tracking and triaging components that cannot be fully analyzed
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: Do I need all three features?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** The features work independently but provide the most value together:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Score Proofs alone**: Useful for compliance and audit trails
|
||||
- **Reachability alone**: Useful for prioritizing remediation
|
||||
- **Together**: Full attack surface context with cryptographic proof
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What's the minimum version required?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Epic 3500 features require:
|
||||
- StellaOps Scanner v2.5.0+
|
||||
- StellaOps CLI v2.5.0+
|
||||
- .NET 10 runtime (for self-hosted deployments)
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: Are these features available in air-gapped environments?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Yes. All Epic 3500 features support air-gap operation:
|
||||
- Score Proofs can be generated and verified offline
|
||||
- Reachability analysis requires no network connectivity
|
||||
- Unknowns data persists locally
|
||||
|
||||
See the [Air-Gap Operations Guide](../operations/airgap-operations-runbook.md) for details.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Score Proofs
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What exactly is a Score Proof?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** A Score Proof is a DSSE-signed attestation bundle containing:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Score Proof Bundle
|
||||
├── scan_manifest.json # Content-addressed inputs (SBOM, feeds)
|
||||
├── proof.dsse # DSSE-signed attestation
|
||||
├── merkle_proof.json # Merkle tree proof for individual findings
|
||||
└── replay_instructions.md # How to reproduce the scan
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The proof guarantees that given the same inputs, anyone can reproduce the exact same vulnerability scores.
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: Why do I need Score Proofs?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Score Proofs solve several problems:
|
||||
|
||||
| Problem | Solution |
|
||||
|---------|----------|
|
||||
| "Scanner gave different results yesterday" | Manifest captures exact inputs |
|
||||
| "How do I prove to auditors this was the score?" | DSSE signatures provide non-repudiation |
|
||||
| "Can I trust this third-party scan?" | Independent verification possible |
|
||||
| "Which advisory version was used?" | All feed digests recorded |
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: How do I generate a Score Proof?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Enable proofs during scanning:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# CLI
|
||||
stella scan --sbom ./sbom.json --generate-proof --output ./scan-with-proof/
|
||||
|
||||
# API
|
||||
POST /api/v1/scans
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sbomDigest": "sha256:abc...",
|
||||
"options": {
|
||||
"generateProof": true
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: How do I verify a Score Proof?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Use the verify command:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Verify signature and Merkle root
|
||||
stella proof verify ./scan-with-proof/proof.dsse
|
||||
|
||||
# Full replay verification (re-runs scan)
|
||||
stella score replay ./scan-with-proof/ --verify
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: Can I verify proofs without network access?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Yes. Verification only requires:
|
||||
- The proof bundle
|
||||
- A trusted public key
|
||||
- Optionally, the original inputs (for replay)
|
||||
|
||||
See: [Proof Verification Runbook](../operations/proof-verification-runbook.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What signing algorithms are supported?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Current support includes:
|
||||
|
||||
| Algorithm | Status | Use Case |
|
||||
|-----------|--------|----------|
|
||||
| ECDSA P-256 | ✅ Supported | Default, widely compatible |
|
||||
| ECDSA P-384 | ✅ Supported | Higher security |
|
||||
| RSA-2048 | ✅ Supported | Legacy compatibility |
|
||||
| Ed25519 | ✅ Supported | Modern, fast |
|
||||
| PQC (ML-DSA) | 🔜 Roadmap | Post-quantum ready |
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: How long are proofs valid?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Proofs don't expire, but their trust depends on:
|
||||
- Key validity at signing time
|
||||
- Certificate chain validity (if using X.509)
|
||||
- Rekor timestamp (if transparency log enabled)
|
||||
|
||||
Best practice: Archive proofs with their verification materials.
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What's the overhead of generating proofs?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Typical overhead:
|
||||
- **Time**: +5-15% scan duration
|
||||
- **Storage**: +10-20KB per scan (proof bundle)
|
||||
- **CPU**: Minimal (signing is fast)
|
||||
|
||||
For detailed benchmarks, see [Performance Workbook](../12_PERFORMANCE_WORKBOOK.md).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Reachability Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What is reachability analysis?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Reachability analysis answers: "Can vulnerable code actually be executed?"
|
||||
|
||||
It analyzes your application's call graph to determine if vulnerable functions in dependencies are reachable from your entry points.
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What are the reachability verdicts?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Verdict | Meaning | Action |
|
||||
|---------|---------|--------|
|
||||
| `REACHABLE_STATIC` | Vulnerable code is on an executable path | **Prioritize fix** |
|
||||
| `POSSIBLY_REACHABLE` | May be reachable under certain conditions | **Review** |
|
||||
| `NOT_REACHABLE` | No path from entry points to vulnerable code | **Lower priority** |
|
||||
| `UNKNOWN` | Analysis couldn't determine reachability | **Manual review** |
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What's the difference from EPSS?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | What It Measures | Data Source |
|
||||
|--------|------------------|-------------|
|
||||
| **EPSS** | Probability of exploitation in the wild | Threat intelligence |
|
||||
| **Reachability** | Whether your code can trigger the vuln | Your application's call graph |
|
||||
|
||||
They're complementary: EPSS tells you "how likely is exploitation globally", reachability tells you "can it affect me specifically".
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: How do I enable reachability analysis?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# CLI - analyze SBOM with reachability
|
||||
stella scan --sbom ./sbom.json --reachability
|
||||
|
||||
# With call graph input
|
||||
stella scan --sbom ./sbom.json --call-graph ./callgraph.json
|
||||
|
||||
# Generate call graph first
|
||||
stella scan graph ./src --output ./callgraph.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What languages are supported for call graph analysis?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Language | Support Level | Notes |
|
||||
|----------|---------------|-------|
|
||||
| Java | Full | Requires bytecode |
|
||||
| JavaScript/TS | Full | Requires source |
|
||||
| Python | Full | Requires source |
|
||||
| Go | Full | Requires source or binary |
|
||||
| C# | Partial | Basic support |
|
||||
| C/C++ | Limited | Best-effort |
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What if my language isn't supported?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** You can:
|
||||
1. Provide a custom call graph in standard format
|
||||
2. Use `UNKNOWN` verdict handling
|
||||
3. Combine with other prioritization signals (EPSS, VEX)
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: How accurate is reachability analysis?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Accuracy depends on several factors:
|
||||
|
||||
| Factor | Impact |
|
||||
|--------|--------|
|
||||
| Call graph completeness | Higher completeness = better accuracy |
|
||||
| Dynamic dispatch | May cause under-reporting (conservative) |
|
||||
| Reflection/eval | May cause under-reporting |
|
||||
| Language support | Full support = more accurate |
|
||||
|
||||
StellaOps errs on the side of caution: if uncertain, it reports `POSSIBLY_REACHABLE` rather than false negatives.
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What's the performance impact?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Reachability analysis adds:
|
||||
- **Call graph generation**: 10-60 seconds depending on codebase size
|
||||
- **Reachability computation**: 1-10 seconds per scan
|
||||
- **Memory**: Call graph size varies (typically 10-100MB)
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: Can I cache call graphs?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Yes. If your code hasn't changed, reuse the call graph:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Cache the call graph
|
||||
stella scan graph ./src --output ./callgraph.json
|
||||
|
||||
# Reuse in subsequent scans
|
||||
stella scan --sbom ./sbom.json --call-graph ./callgraph.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Unknowns Queue
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What is the unknowns queue?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** The unknowns queue tracks components that couldn't be fully analyzed:
|
||||
- Packages without advisory mappings
|
||||
- Unrecognized file formats
|
||||
- Resolution failures
|
||||
- Unsupported ecosystems
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: Why should I care about unknowns?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Unknowns represent blind spots:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
❌ 5% unknown = 5% of your attack surface is invisible
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Unmanaged unknowns can hide critical vulnerabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: How do I view unknowns?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# List pending unknowns
|
||||
stella unknowns list
|
||||
|
||||
# Get statistics
|
||||
stella unknowns stats
|
||||
|
||||
# Export for analysis
|
||||
stella unknowns list --format csv > unknowns.csv
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: How do I resolve unknowns?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Common resolution paths:
|
||||
|
||||
| Unknown Type | Resolution |
|
||||
|--------------|------------|
|
||||
| Internal package | Mark as `internal_package` |
|
||||
| Missing mapping | Submit CPE/PURL mapping |
|
||||
| Feed delay | Update feeds, reprocess |
|
||||
| Unsupported format | Convert to supported format |
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Resolve as internal package
|
||||
stella unknowns resolve <id> --resolution internal_package
|
||||
|
||||
# After feed update, reprocess
|
||||
stella feeds update --all
|
||||
stella unknowns reprocess
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What's a good unknowns rate?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Target metrics:
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Good | Warning | Critical |
|
||||
|--------|------|---------|----------|
|
||||
| Unknown package % | < 5% | 5-10% | > 10% |
|
||||
| Pending queue depth | < 50 | 50-100 | > 100 |
|
||||
| Avg resolution time | < 7d | 7-14d | > 14d |
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: Can I automate unknown handling?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Yes, using patterns:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# config/unknowns.yaml
|
||||
internalPatterns:
|
||||
- "@mycompany/*"
|
||||
- "internal-*"
|
||||
autoResolution:
|
||||
- match: "reason = NO_ADVISORY_MATCH AND ecosystem = internal"
|
||||
resolution: internal_package
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration & Deployment
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: How do I integrate with CI/CD?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Example GitHub Actions workflow:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
- name: Scan with proofs and reachability
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
stella scan \
|
||||
--sbom ./sbom.json \
|
||||
--generate-proof \
|
||||
--reachability \
|
||||
--output ./results/
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Fail on reachable criticals
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
REACHABLE=$(stella query --filter "reachability=REACHABLE_STATIC AND severity=CRITICAL" --count)
|
||||
if [ "$REACHABLE" -gt 0 ]; then
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: Can I use these features in GitLab CI?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Yes, same commands work in any CI system. See [CI Integration Guide](../ci/).
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What API endpoints are available?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Key endpoints:
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature | Endpoint | Method |
|
||||
|---------|----------|--------|
|
||||
| Generate proof | `/api/v1/scans/{id}/proof` | GET |
|
||||
| Verify proof | `/api/v1/proofs/verify` | POST |
|
||||
| Reachability | `/api/v1/scans/{id}/reachability` | GET |
|
||||
| Unknowns | `/api/v1/unknowns` | GET/POST/DELETE |
|
||||
|
||||
Full API reference: [API Documentation](../api/)
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: How do I configure retention?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Configure in `appsettings.json`:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"Retention": {
|
||||
"Proofs": {
|
||||
"DefaultDays": 365,
|
||||
"MaxDays": 1825
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Reachability": {
|
||||
"CacheHours": 24
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Unknowns": {
|
||||
"ArchiveAfterDays": 90
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Performance
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: What's the performance impact of enabling all features?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Typical combined overhead:
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature | Time Overhead | Storage Overhead |
|
||||
|---------|---------------|------------------|
|
||||
| Base scan | Baseline | Baseline |
|
||||
| + Proof generation | +5-15% | +20KB |
|
||||
| + Reachability | +50-200% | +50KB |
|
||||
| + All features | +60-220% | +70KB |
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: How do I optimize for large codebases?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Cache call graphs** for incremental scans
|
||||
2. **Use parallel processing** for multi-repo scans
|
||||
3. **Limit reachability depth** for very large graphs
|
||||
4. **Use deterministic mode** only when needed
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Limit BFS depth for large graphs
|
||||
stella scan --reachability --reachability-depth 10
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: Are there size limits?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Resource | Default Limit | Configurable |
|
||||
|----------|---------------|--------------|
|
||||
| SBOM size | 50MB | Yes |
|
||||
| Call graph nodes | 1M | Yes |
|
||||
| Proof bundle size | 10MB | Yes |
|
||||
| Unknowns queue | 10K items | Yes |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: Score replay gives different results
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Check:
|
||||
1. Feed versions match (`stella feeds status`)
|
||||
2. Algorithm version matches
|
||||
3. No clock skew (UTC timestamps)
|
||||
4. Same configuration settings
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Verify manifest
|
||||
stella proof verify --manifest-only ./proof.dsse
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: Reachability shows everything as UNKNOWN
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** This usually means:
|
||||
1. Call graph wasn't generated
|
||||
2. Language not supported
|
||||
3. Source code not available
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Check call graph status
|
||||
stella scan graph status ./callgraph.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: Unknowns queue growing rapidly
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Common causes:
|
||||
1. **Feed staleness**: Update feeds
|
||||
2. **Internal packages**: Configure internal patterns
|
||||
3. **New ecosystems**: Check language support
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Diagnose
|
||||
stella unknowns stats --by-reason
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: Proof verification fails
|
||||
|
||||
**A:** Check:
|
||||
1. Public key matches signing key
|
||||
2. Certificate not expired
|
||||
3. Bundle not corrupted
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Detailed verification
|
||||
stella proof verify ./proof.dsse --verbose
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Q: Where do I get more help?
|
||||
|
||||
**A:**
|
||||
- [Operations Runbooks](../operations/)
|
||||
- [Troubleshooting Guide](troubleshooting-guide.md)
|
||||
- [Architecture Documentation](../07_HIGH_LEVEL_ARCHITECTURE.md)
|
||||
- Support: support@stellaops.example.com
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### Commands Cheat Sheet
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Score Proofs
|
||||
stella scan --generate-proof # Generate proof
|
||||
stella proof verify ./proof.dsse # Verify proof
|
||||
stella score replay ./bundle/ # Replay scan
|
||||
|
||||
# Reachability
|
||||
stella scan graph ./src # Generate call graph
|
||||
stella scan --reachability # Scan with reachability
|
||||
stella reachability query --filter # Query reachability data
|
||||
|
||||
# Unknowns
|
||||
stella unknowns list # List unknowns
|
||||
stella unknowns resolve <id> # Resolve unknown
|
||||
stella unknowns stats # Statistics
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Configuration Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"ScoreProofs": {
|
||||
"Enabled": true,
|
||||
"SigningAlgorithm": "ECDSA-P256"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Reachability": {
|
||||
"Enabled": true,
|
||||
"MaxDepth": 50,
|
||||
"CacheEnabled": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Unknowns": {
|
||||
"AutoResolveInternal": true,
|
||||
"InternalPatterns": ["@company/*"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Feedback?** Submit issues or suggestions via the project's issue tracker.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user