feat: Add guild charters and task boards for various components
Some checks failed
Docs CI / lint-and-preview (push) Has been cancelled
Some checks failed
Docs CI / lint-and-preview (push) Has been cancelled
- Introduced guild charters for Scanner Deno, PHP, Ruby, Native, WebService, Java, Surface.Env, Surface.FS, Surface.Secrets, Surface.Validation, UI, Zastava Observer, Zastava Webhook, Zastava Core, and Plugin Platform. - Each charter outlines the mission, scope, required reading, and working agreements for the respective guilds. - Created task boards for Surface.Env, Surface.FS, Surface.Secrets, Surface.Validation, and Zastava components to track progress and dependencies. - Ensured all documents emphasize determinism, offline readiness, security, and integration with shared Surface libraries.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,23 +1,33 @@
|
||||
# Risk Engine Guild Charter
|
||||
|
||||
## Mission
|
||||
Design, build, and operate the scoring runtime that computes Risk Scoring Profiles across StellaOps deployments while preserving provenance and explainability.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope
|
||||
- Scoring workers, job scheduler, provider registry, caching, and explainability artifacts.
|
||||
- Integration with Findings Ledger, Conseiller, Excitator, and Policy Engine.
|
||||
- Performance, determinism, and observability of scoring jobs.
|
||||
- Air-gapped support through offline factor bundles.
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition of Done
|
||||
- Scoring jobs execute deterministically with audit trails and explainability payloads.
|
||||
- Providers registered with TTLs and health checks; missing data surfaced explicitly.
|
||||
- Benchmarks and SLO dashboards in place with incident response runbooks.
|
||||
|
||||
## Module Layout
|
||||
- `StellaOps.RiskEngine.Core/` — scoring orchestrators, provider contracts, explainability models.
|
||||
- `StellaOps.RiskEngine.Infrastructure/` — persistence, caching, provider loading, external data connectors.
|
||||
- `StellaOps.RiskEngine.WebService/` — APIs for jobs, results, explanations.
|
||||
- `StellaOps.RiskEngine.Worker/` — execution loops, provider refreshers, scoring pipelines.
|
||||
- `StellaOps.RiskEngine.Tests/` — unit tests for core/infrastructure services.
|
||||
- `StellaOps.RiskEngine.sln` — solution unifying module projects.
|
||||
# Risk Engine Guild Charter
|
||||
|
||||
## Mission
|
||||
Design, build, and operate the scoring runtime that computes Risk Scoring Profiles across StellaOps deployments while preserving provenance and explainability.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope
|
||||
- Scoring workers, job scheduler, provider registry, caching, and explainability artifacts.
|
||||
- Integration with Findings Ledger, Conseiller, Excitator, and Policy Engine.
|
||||
- Performance, determinism, and observability of scoring jobs.
|
||||
- Air-gapped support through offline factor bundles.
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition of Done
|
||||
- Scoring jobs execute deterministically with audit trails and explainability payloads.
|
||||
- Providers registered with TTLs and health checks; missing data surfaced explicitly.
|
||||
- Benchmarks and SLO dashboards in place with incident response runbooks.
|
||||
|
||||
## Module Layout
|
||||
- `StellaOps.RiskEngine.Core/` — scoring orchestrators, provider contracts, explainability models.
|
||||
- `StellaOps.RiskEngine.Infrastructure/` — persistence, caching, provider loading, external data connectors.
|
||||
- `StellaOps.RiskEngine.WebService/` — APIs for jobs, results, explanations.
|
||||
- `StellaOps.RiskEngine.Worker/` — execution loops, provider refreshers, scoring pipelines.
|
||||
- `StellaOps.RiskEngine.Tests/` — unit tests for core/infrastructure services.
|
||||
- `StellaOps.RiskEngine.sln` — solution unifying module projects.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Reading
|
||||
- `docs/modules/platform/architecture-overview.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Working Agreement
|
||||
- 1. Update task status to `DOING`/`DONE` in both `docs/implplan/SPRINTS.md` and the local `TASKS.md` when you start or finish work.
|
||||
- 2. Review this charter and the Required Reading documents before coding; confirm prerequisites are met.
|
||||
- 3. Keep changes deterministic (stable ordering, timestamps, hashes) and align with offline/air-gap expectations.
|
||||
- 4. Coordinate doc updates, tests, and cross-guild communication whenever contracts or workflows change.
|
||||
- 5. Revert to `TODO` if you pause the task without shipping changes; leave notes in commit/PR descriptions for context.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user